Parliamentary shenanigans aside, the “Star Wars ban

Your go-to forum for bot dataset expertise.
Post Reply
samiaseo222
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2024 3:25 am

Parliamentary shenanigans aside, the “Star Wars ban

Post by samiaseo222 »

After the activistic community learned about the bill and a flurry of activity and debate erupted, it was amended and became HR 3616, the Space Preservation Act of 2002.

Skeptics were justifiably concerned that the bill was just another attempt by Congress to fool people into thinking it was banning harmful technology when it was actually strengthening the federal government's authority to use it. The amended bill, which removes some of the protections contained in HR 2977, supports the theory that Congress is debating a red herring. The bill only aims to protect a strata 97 miles above the earh surface from Star Wars technology.

” bBof certain technologies. Previously the job function email list territory of paranoid anti-government extremists, non-lethal mind control and immunosuppressive systems are being debated in Congress and have hit the mainstream media.

Included in the proposed ban are devices capable of directing lasers, chemical or biological sprays, and electromagnetic radiation to inflict “death or injury on . . . biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person.”

Originally included were sections banning devices for “inflicting death or injury on . . . biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person . . . through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations; or by expelling chemical or biological agents in the vicinity of a person.”
Post Reply